Cookie Control vs Usercentrics: cookie banner speed and features compared
On desktop, Cookie Control showed its banner sooner, in a median 385 ms against 672 ms for Usercentrics. Neither added a measurable delay. Neither leaked a tracker in the checks that ran. We could not run 1 of 4 checks for Cookie Control. Their documented features are the same in this comparison.
Cookie Control Tested: v9, hosted
All Cookie Control results
Usercentrics Tested: Hosted
All Usercentrics results
Which is faster, Cookie Control or Usercentrics?
Shorter bars are better. The exception is tracker blocking, where the bar shows the share of checks passed.
| Question | Difference | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Banner appearsTime from navigation until the banner is visible on screen. Lower is better. | 385 ms | 672 ms | Cookie Control’s banner appeared 287 ms sooner. |
| Page slowed byExtra time before the main content paints (LCP), compared with the same page without a consent manager. | No measurable delay95% interval −16 ms to 20 ms | No measurable delay95% interval −16 ms to 16 ms | Neither added a measurable delay. |
| Click responds inTime from pressing Accept until the screen updates. Under 200 ms feels instant. | 16 msOne visit measured | 16 msOne visit measured | About the same. They are less than 16 ms apart. |
| Blocks trackersChecks that no tracker runs, the page sets no cookie and no data leaves the page before the visitor chooses. | 3 of 4 checks passed1 could not be checked | 4 of 4 checks passed | Neither leaked a tracker in the checks that ran. We could not run 1 of 4 checks for Cookie Control. |
| Adds to pageExtra data transferred during the first load, compared with the same page without a consent manager. | +99 KB95% interval: 99 KB | +164 KB95% interval: 164 KB | Cookie Control added 66 KB less to the first load. |
“About the same” means that the two results fall within each other’s spread. We measure both against the same page without a consent manager. We do not publish a direct head-to-head interval yet.
Page vitals and load times
Lab detail for engineers. All values are medians on the desktop profile. Both CMPs ran on Next.js 16.
| Metric | Cookie Control | Usercentrics |
|---|---|---|
| TTFB | No measurable delaypage 6 ms | No measurable delaypage 5 ms |
| FCP | No measurable delaypage 64 ms | No measurable delaypage 64 ms |
| LCP | No measurable delaypage 128 ms | No measurable delaypage 120 ms |
| CLS | No measurable shiftpage 0.00 | No measurable shiftpage 0.00 |
| Metric | Cookie Control | Usercentrics |
|---|---|---|
| CMP script requested | ||
| CMP script loaded | ||
| Consent state known | ||
| Banner visible | 385 ms | 672 ms |
| Metric | Cookie Control | Usercentrics |
|---|---|---|
| Screen responds | 16 ms | 16 ms |
| Banner gone | ||
| Consent applied | ||
| Analytics active |
Which features differ between Cookie Control and Usercentrics?
Statuses come from each vendor’s documentation. Each status links to its source.
- Verified by test
- Per vendor docs
- Partial
- Not supported
- Unknown
| Feature | Cookie Control | Usercentrics |
|---|---|---|
| Not confirmed for one side · 2 | ||
| IAB GPPStandards | Unknown | v3 script tag (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab) |
| TypeScript typesDeveloper | Unknown | Per vendor docs (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab) |
Same on both · 14
Should you choose Cookie Control or Usercentrics?
We built these lists from the measured and documented differences above. Neither list is a recommendation.
Choose Cookie Control if
- A fast banner matters to you: Cookie Control’s banner appeared 287 ms sooner
- Page weight matters to you: Cookie Control added 66 KB less to the first load
Choose Usercentrics if
- Nothing measured or documented here favours Usercentrics. Decide on price, support and the tools that you already use
What was tested?
- Deployment
- Both ran from their vendor-hosted services. Network distance to each vendor is part of the result.
Questions about Cookie Control and Usercentrics
Answers come from the benchmark run and from each vendor’s documentation.
On the desktop profile, Cookie Control’s banner appeared in a median 385 ms and Usercentrics’ in 672 ms. Neither added a measurable delay.
Both document it. Statuses come from vendor docs.
Neither leaked a tracker in the checks that ran. We could not run 1 of 4 checks for Cookie Control. Each check loads the page. Then it looks for trackers that ran, cookies that the page set or data that left the page before the visitor chose.
Other comparisons
c15tvs
Usercentricsc15t’s banner 645 ms sooner · 1 standard differsc15tvs
Cookie Controlc15t’s banner 358 ms sooner · 1 standard differsOneTrustvs
UsercentricsBanner times about the same · 2 features differ
Didomivs
UsercentricsDidomi’s banner 206 ms sooner · 2 features differ
Cookie Controlvs
CookieYesBanner times about the same · Same documented featuresc15tvs
OneTrustc15t’s banner 603 ms sooner · 1 standard differs