Cookie Control vs CookieYes: cookie banner speed and features compared
On desktop, Cookie Control and CookieYes showed their banners in about the same time. The medians were 385 ms for Cookie Control and 387 ms for CookieYes. Neither added a measurable delay. Neither leaked a tracker in the checks that ran. We could not run 1 of 4 checks for Cookie Control and 1 of 4 checks for CookieYes. Their documented features are the same in this comparison.
Cookie Control Tested: v9, hosted
All Cookie Control results
CookieYes Tested: Hosted
All CookieYes results
Which is faster, Cookie Control or CookieYes?
Shorter bars are better. The exception is tracker blocking, where the bar shows the share of checks passed.
| Question | Difference | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Banner appearsTime from navigation until the banner is visible on screen. Lower is better. | 385 ms | 387 ms | About the same. They are less than 16 ms apart. |
| Page slowed byExtra time before the main content paints (LCP), compared with the same page without a consent manager. | No measurable delay95% interval −16 ms to 20 ms | No measurable delay95% interval −12 ms to 24 ms | Neither added a measurable delay. |
| Click responds inTime from pressing Accept until the screen updates. Under 200 ms feels instant. | 16 msOne visit measured | 16 msOne visit measured | About the same. They are less than 16 ms apart. |
| Blocks trackersChecks that no tracker runs, the page sets no cookie and no data leaves the page before the visitor chooses. | 3 of 4 checks passed1 could not be checked | 3 of 4 checks passed1 could not be checked | Neither leaked a tracker in the checks that ran. We could not run 1 of 4 checks for Cookie Control and 1 of 4 checks for CookieYes. |
| Adds to pageExtra data transferred during the first load, compared with the same page without a consent manager. | +99 KB95% interval: 99 KB | +31 KB95% interval: 31 KB | CookieYes added 68 KB less to the first load. |
“About the same” means that the two results fall within each other’s spread. We measure both against the same page without a consent manager. We do not publish a direct head-to-head interval yet.
Page vitals and load times
Lab detail for engineers. All values are medians on the desktop profile. Both CMPs ran on Next.js 16.
| Metric | Cookie Control | CookieYes |
|---|---|---|
| TTFB | No measurable delaypage 6 ms | No measurable delaypage 8 ms |
| FCP | No measurable delaypage 64 ms | No measurable delaypage 64 ms |
| LCP | No measurable delaypage 128 ms | No measurable delaypage 132 ms |
| CLS | No measurable shiftpage 0.00 | No measurable shiftpage 0.00 |
| Metric | Cookie Control | CookieYes |
|---|---|---|
| CMP script requested | ||
| CMP script loaded | ||
| Consent state known | ||
| Banner visible | 385 ms | 387 ms |
| Metric | Cookie Control | CookieYes |
|---|---|---|
| Screen responds | 16 ms | 16 ms |
| Banner gone | ||
| Consent applied | ||
| Analytics active |
Which features differ between Cookie Control and CookieYes?
Statuses come from each vendor’s documentation. Each status links to its source.
- Verified by test
- Per vendor docs
- Partial
- Not supported
- Unknown
| Feature | Cookie Control | CookieYes |
|---|---|---|
| Not confirmed for one side · 2 | ||
| Self-hostableDeveloper | Hosted service (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab) | Unknown |
| Headless UIDeveloper | JavaScript methods only (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab) | Unknown |
Same on both · 14
Should you choose Cookie Control or CookieYes?
We built these lists from the measured and documented differences above. Neither list is a recommendation.
Choose Cookie Control if
- Nothing measured or documented here favours Cookie Control. Decide on price, support and the tools that you already use
Choose CookieYes if
- Page weight matters to you: CookieYes added 68 KB less to the first load
What was tested?
- Deployment
- Both ran from their vendor-hosted services. Network distance to each vendor is part of the result.
Questions about Cookie Control and CookieYes
Answers come from the benchmark run and from each vendor’s documentation.
Not in a way this run can separate. Their banner times were about the same. They are less than 16 ms apart. Neither added a measurable delay.
Both document it. Statuses come from vendor docs.
Neither leaked a tracker in the checks that ran. We could not run 1 of 4 checks for Cookie Control and 1 of 4 checks for CookieYes. Each check loads the page. Then it looks for trackers that ran, cookies that the page set or data that left the page before the visitor chose.
Other comparisons
c15tvs
CookieYesc15t’s banner 327 ms sooner · 1 standard differsc15tvs
Cookie Controlc15t’s banner 325 ms sooner · 1 standard differs
CookieYesvsOneTrustCookieYes’ banner 242 ms sooner · 1 feature differs
iubendavs
CookieYesBanner times about the same · Same documented featuresc15tvs
OneTrustc15t’s banner 570 ms sooner · 1 standard differs
c15tvs
Usercentricsc15t’s banner 612 ms sooner · 1 standard differs