Skip to main content

OneTrust vs Usercentrics: cookie banner speed and features compared

Results for

On emulated mobile, OneTrust and Usercentrics showed their banners in about the same time. The medians were 3.92 s for OneTrust and 4.16 s for Usercentrics. OneTrust delayed the main content 368 ms less. Both held trackers back in every check. Per vendor docs, only OneTrust offers self-hosting. Per vendor docs, only Usercentrics offers a free tier.

OneTrustOneTrust

OneTrust Tested: Hosted
All OneTrust results

UsercentricsUsercentrics

Usercentrics Tested: Hosted
All Usercentrics results

Which is faster, OneTrust or Usercentrics?

Shorter bars are better. The exception is tracker blocking, where the bar shows the share of checks passed.

OneTrust and Usercentrics on the mobile (emulated) profile, Next.js 16
QuestionOneTrustUsercentricsDifference
Banner appearsTime from navigation until the banner is visible on screen. Lower is better.
3.92 sModerate
4.16 sSlow

About the same. The gap is under 20%, within run-to-run noise.

Page slowed byExtra time before the main content paints (LCP), compared with the same page without a consent manager.
+476 ms95% interval 444 ms to 508 msSmall
+844 ms95% interval 836 ms to 864 msNoticeable

OneTrust delayed the main content 368 ms less.

Click responds inTime from pressing Accept until the screen updates. Under 200 ms feels instant.
16 msOne visit measuredFast
Under 16 msOne visit measuredFast

About the same. They are less than 16 ms apart.

Blocks trackersChecks that no tracker runs, the page sets no cookie and no data leaves the page before the visitor chooses.
4 of 4 checks passedBlocked
4 of 4 checks passedBlocked

Both held trackers back in every check.

Adds to pageExtra data transferred during the first load, compared with the same page without a consent manager.
+211 KB95% interval: 211 KBModerate
+164 KB95% interval: 164 KBModerate

Usercentrics added 47 KB less to the first load.

“About the same” means that the two results fall within each other’s spread. We measure both against the same page without a consent manager. We do not publish a direct head-to-head interval yet.

Page vitals and load times

Lab detail for engineers. All values are medians on the mobile profile. Both CMPs ran on Next.js 16.

Page vitalsChange against the same page without a consent manager.
MetricOneTrustUsercentrics
TTFBNo measurable delaypage 6 msNo measurable delaypage 7 ms
FCPNo measurable delaypage 248 msNo measurable delaypage 252 ms
LCP+476 mspage 3.93 s+844 mspage 4.30 s
CLSNo measurable shiftpage 0.00No measurable shiftpage 0.00
Load timesMilliseconds from navigation.
MetricOneTrustUsercentrics
CMP script requested
CMP script loaded
Consent state known
Banner visible3.92 s4.16 s
After AcceptMilliseconds from the click.
MetricOneTrustUsercentrics
Screen responds16 msUnder 16 ms
Banner gone
Consent applied
Analytics active

Which features differ between OneTrust and Usercentrics?

Statuses come from each vendor’s documentation. Each status links to its source.

  • Verified by test
  • Per vendor docs
  • Partial
  • Not supported
  • Unknown
Features that differ between OneTrust and Usercentrics, from vendor docs
FeatureOneTrustUsercentrics
Only OneTrust · 1
Self-hostableDeveloperScript only; hosted backend (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab)Hosted backend (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab)
Only Usercentrics · 1
Free tierPricingQuote-based pricing (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab)1,000 sessions a month (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab)
Not confirmed for one side · 1
TypeScript typesDeveloperUnknownPer vendor docs (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab)
Same on both · 13
Features with the same status for OneTrust and Usercentrics
FeatureOneTrustUsercentrics
IAB TCFStandardsTCF v2.2 and v2.3 (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab)Pro plan and up (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab)
IAB GPPStandardsPer vendor docs (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab)v3 script tag (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab)
Google Consent Mode v2StandardsPer vendor docs (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab)Per vendor docs (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab)
Google-certified CMPStandardsPer vendor docs (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab)Per vendor docs (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab)
Global Privacy ControlStandardsPer vendor docs (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab)Per vendor docs (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab)
Geo-targeted bannersCompliancePer vendor docs (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab)Plus plan and up (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab)
Script blockingCompliancePer vendor docs (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab)Paid plans (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab)
Consent recordsCompliancePer vendor docs (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab)Kept 12 months (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab)
Cookie scanningCompliancePer vendor docs (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab)Per vendor docs (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab)
Open sourceDeveloperProprietary (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab)Commercial licence (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab)
Headless UIDeveloperMobile and CTV only (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab)Per vendor docs (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab)
Script tagFrameworksPer vendor docs (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab)Per vendor docs (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab)
First-party SDKsReact, Next.js, Vue, Nuxt, Svelte, SvelteKit, Astro, TanStack StartScript tag only (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab)Script tag only (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab)

Should you choose OneTrust or Usercentrics?

We built these lists from the measured and documented differences above. Neither list is a recommendation.

Choose OneTrust if

  • You want self-hosting
  • Page load time matters to you: OneTrust delayed the main content 368 ms less

Choose Usercentrics if

  • You want a free tier
  • Page weight matters to you: Usercentrics added 47 KB less to the first load

What was tested?

Deployment
Both ran from their vendor-hosted services. Network distance to each vendor is part of the result.

How we test: methodology cookiebench-v3.2.4

Questions about OneTrust and Usercentrics

Answers come from the benchmark run and from each vendor’s documentation.

Not in a way this run can separate. Their banner times were about the same. The gap is under 20%, within run-to-run noise. OneTrust delayed the main content 368 ms less.