Do Enzuzo and Usercentrics both support IAB TCF?

Both document it. Statuses come from vendor docs.

Do Enzuzo and Usercentrics block trackers before consent?

Both held trackers back in every check. Each check loads the page. Then it looks for trackers that ran, cookies that the page set or data that left the page before the visitor chose.

Enzuzo vs Usercentrics: cookie banner speed and features compared

Results forFramework

On desktop, Enzuzo showed its banner sooner, in a median 477 ms against 672 ms for Usercentrics. Enzuzo delayed the main content by 4 ms. Usercentrics added no measurable delay. Both held trackers back in every check. Their documented features are the same in this comparison.

EnzuzoEnzuzo

Enzuzo Tested: Hosted
All Enzuzo results

UsercentricsUsercentrics

Usercentrics Tested: Hosted
All Usercentrics results

Which is faster, Enzuzo or Usercentrics?

Shorter bars are better. The exception is tracker blocking, where the bar shows the share of checks passed.

Enzuzo and Usercentrics on the desktop profile, Next.js 16
Question	Enzuzo	Usercentrics	Difference
Banner appearsTime from navigation until the banner is visible on screen. Lower is better.	477 msModerate	672 msModerate	Enzuzo’s banner appeared 195 ms sooner.
Page slowed byExtra time before the main content paints (LCP), compared with the same page without a consent manager.	+4 msSmall	No measurable delay95% interval −16 ms to 16 msNone	Enzuzo delayed the main content by 4 ms. Usercentrics added no measurable delay.
Click responds inTime from pressing Accept until the screen updates. Under 200 ms feels instant.	24 msOne visit measuredFast	16 msOne visit measuredFast	About the same. They are less than 16 ms apart.
Blocks trackersChecks that no tracker runs, the page sets no cookie and no data leaves the page before the visitor chooses.	4 of 4 checks passedBlocked	4 of 4 checks passedBlocked	Both held trackers back in every check.
Adds to pageExtra data transferred during the first load, compared with the same page without a consent manager.	+153 KBModerate	+164 KB95% interval: 164 KBModerate	About the same. The gap is under 20%, within run-to-run noise.

“About the same” means that the two results fall within each other’s spread. We measure both against the same page without a consent manager. We do not publish a direct head-to-head interval yet.

Page vitals and load times

Lab detail for engineers. All values are medians on the desktop profile. Both CMPs ran on Next.js 16.

Page vitalsChange against the same page without a consent manager.
Metric	Enzuzo	Usercentrics
TTFB	+0 mspage 6 ms	No measurable delaypage 5 ms
FCP	0 mspage 64 ms	No measurable delaypage 64 ms
LCP	+4 mspage 124 ms	No measurable delaypage 120 ms
CLS	No measurable shiftpage 0.00	No measurable shiftpage 0.00

Load timesMilliseconds from navigation.
Metric	Enzuzo	Usercentrics
CMP script requested
CMP script loaded
Consent state known
Banner visible	477 ms	672 ms

After AcceptMilliseconds from the click.
Metric	Enzuzo	Usercentrics
Screen responds	24 ms	16 ms
Banner gone
Consent applied
Analytics active

Which features differ between Enzuzo and Usercentrics?

Statuses come from each vendor’s documentation. Each status links to its source.

Verified by test
Per vendor docs
Partial
Not supported
Unknown

Features that differ between Enzuzo and Usercentrics, from vendor docs
Feature	EnzuzoEnzuzo	UsercentricsUsercentrics
Not confirmed for one side · 2
IAB GPPStandards	Unknown	v3 script tag (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab)
TypeScript typesDeveloper	Unknown	Per vendor docs (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab)

Same on both · 14

Features with the same status for Enzuzo and Usercentrics
Feature	EnzuzoEnzuzo	UsercentricsUsercentrics
IAB TCFStandards	Growth plan and up (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab)	Pro plan and up (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab)
Google Consent Mode v2Standards	Per vendor docs (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab)	Per vendor docs (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab)
Google-certified CMPStandards	Per vendor docs (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab)	Per vendor docs (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab)
Global Privacy ControlStandards	Per vendor docs (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab)	Per vendor docs (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab)
Geo-targeted bannersCompliance	Growth plan and up (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab)	Plus plan and up (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab)
Script blockingCompliance	Per vendor docs (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab)	Paid plans (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab)
Consent recordsCompliance	Per vendor docs (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab)	Kept 12 months (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab)
Cookie scanningCompliance	Per vendor docs (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab)	Per vendor docs (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab)
Open sourceDeveloper	Hosted embed only (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab)	Commercial licence (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab)
Self-hostableDeveloper	Hosted embed only (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab)	Hosted backend (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab)
Headless UIDeveloper	Enterprise plan (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab)	Per vendor docs (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab)
Free tierPricing	5,000 visitors a month (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab)	1,000 sessions a month (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab)
Script tagFrameworks	Per vendor docs (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab)	Per vendor docs (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab)
First-party SDKsReact, Next.js, Vue, Nuxt, Svelte, SvelteKit, Astro, TanStack Start	Script tag only (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab)	Script tag only (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab)

Should you choose Enzuzo or Usercentrics?

We built these lists from the measured and documented differences above. Neither list is a recommendation.

Choose Enzuzo if

A fast banner matters to you: Enzuzo’s banner appeared 195 ms sooner

Choose Usercentrics if

Page load time matters to you: Enzuzo delayed the main content by 4 ms. Usercentrics added no measurable delay

What was tested?

Deployment: Both ran from their vendor-hosted services. Network distance to each vendor is part of the result.

How we test: methodology cookiebench-v3.2.4

Questions about Enzuzo and Usercentrics

Answers come from the benchmark run and from each vendor’s documentation.

Report a correction

On the desktop profile, Enzuzo’s banner appeared in a median 477 ms and Usercentrics’ in 672 ms. Enzuzo delayed the main content by 4 ms. Usercentrics added no measurable delay.