Skip to main content

Enzuzo vs OneTrust: cookie banner speed and features compared

Results for

On emulated mobile, Enzuzo showed its banner sooner, in a median 2.75 s against 3.92 s for OneTrust. OneTrust delayed the main content 292 ms less. Both held trackers back in every check. Per vendor docs, only Enzuzo offers a free tier. Per vendor docs, only OneTrust offers self-hosting.

EnzuzoEnzuzo

Enzuzo Tested: Hosted
All Enzuzo results

OneTrustOneTrust

OneTrust Tested: Hosted
All OneTrust results

Which is faster, Enzuzo or OneTrust?

Shorter bars are better. The exception is tracker blocking, where the bar shows the share of checks passed.

Enzuzo and OneTrust on the mobile (emulated) profile, Next.js 16
QuestionEnzuzoOneTrustDifference
Banner appearsTime from navigation until the banner is visible on screen. Lower is better.
2.75 sModerate
3.92 sModerate

Enzuzo’s banner appeared 1.16 s sooner.

Page slowed byExtra time before the main content paints (LCP), compared with the same page without a consent manager.
+768 msNoticeable
+476 ms95% interval 444 ms to 508 msSmall

OneTrust delayed the main content 292 ms less.

Click responds inTime from pressing Accept until the screen updates. Under 200 ms feels instant.
56 msOne visit measuredFast
16 msOne visit measuredFast

OneTrust responded 40 ms sooner. Both are under 200 ms, which feels instant.

Blocks trackersChecks that no tracker runs, the page sets no cookie and no data leaves the page before the visitor chooses.
4 of 4 checks passedBlocked
4 of 4 checks passedBlocked

Both held trackers back in every check.

Adds to pageExtra data transferred during the first load, compared with the same page without a consent manager.
+153 KBModerate
+211 KB95% interval: 211 KBModerate

Enzuzo added 58 KB less to the first load.

“About the same” means that the two results fall within each other’s spread. We measure both against the same page without a consent manager. We do not publish a direct head-to-head interval yet.

Page vitals and load times

Lab detail for engineers. All values are medians on the mobile profile. Both CMPs ran on Next.js 16.

Page vitalsChange against the same page without a consent manager.
MetricEnzuzoOneTrust
TTFB+1 mspage 6 msNo measurable delaypage 6 ms
FCP+8 mspage 248 msNo measurable delaypage 248 ms
LCP+768 mspage 4.22 s+476 mspage 3.93 s
CLSNo measurable shiftpage 0.00No measurable shiftpage 0.00
Load timesMilliseconds from navigation.
MetricEnzuzoOneTrust
CMP script requested
CMP script loaded
Consent state known
Banner visible2.75 s3.92 s
After AcceptMilliseconds from the click.
MetricEnzuzoOneTrust
Screen responds56 ms16 ms
Banner gone
Consent applied
Analytics active

Which features differ between Enzuzo and OneTrust?

Statuses come from each vendor’s documentation. Each status links to its source.

  • Verified by test
  • Per vendor docs
  • Partial
  • Not supported
  • Unknown
Features that differ between Enzuzo and OneTrust, from vendor docs
FeatureEnzuzoOneTrust
Only Enzuzo · 1
Free tierPricing5,000 visitors a month (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab)Quote-based pricing (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab)
Only OneTrust · 1
Self-hostableDeveloperHosted embed only (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab)Script only; hosted backend (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab)
Not confirmed for one side · 1
IAB GPPStandardsUnknownPer vendor docs (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab)
Same on both · 13
Features with the same status for Enzuzo and OneTrust
FeatureEnzuzoOneTrust
IAB TCFStandardsGrowth plan and up (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab)TCF v2.2 and v2.3 (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab)
Google Consent Mode v2StandardsPer vendor docs (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab)Per vendor docs (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab)
Google-certified CMPStandardsPer vendor docs (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab)Per vendor docs (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab)
Global Privacy ControlStandardsPer vendor docs (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab)Per vendor docs (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab)
Geo-targeted bannersComplianceGrowth plan and up (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab)Per vendor docs (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab)
Script blockingCompliancePer vendor docs (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab)Per vendor docs (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab)
Consent recordsCompliancePer vendor docs (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab)Per vendor docs (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab)
Cookie scanningCompliancePer vendor docs (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab)Per vendor docs (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab)
Open sourceDeveloperHosted embed only (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab)Proprietary (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab)
Headless UIDeveloperEnterprise plan (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab)Mobile and CTV only (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab)
TypeScript typesDeveloperUnknownUnknown
Script tagFrameworksPer vendor docs (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab)Per vendor docs (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab)
First-party SDKsReact, Next.js, Vue, Nuxt, Svelte, SvelteKit, Astro, TanStack StartScript tag only (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab)Script tag only (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab)

Should you choose Enzuzo or OneTrust?

We built these lists from the measured and documented differences above. Neither list is a recommendation.

Choose Enzuzo if

  • You want a free tier
  • A fast banner matters to you: Enzuzo’s banner appeared 1.16 s sooner
  • Page weight matters to you: Enzuzo added 58 KB less to the first load

Choose OneTrust if

  • You want self-hosting
  • Page load time matters to you: OneTrust delayed the main content 292 ms less

What was tested?

Deployment
Both ran from their vendor-hosted services. Network distance to each vendor is part of the result.

How we test: methodology cookiebench-v3.2.4

Questions about Enzuzo and OneTrust

Answers come from the benchmark run and from each vendor’s documentation.

On the emulated mobile profile, Enzuzo’s banner appeared in a median 2.75 s and OneTrust’s in 3.92 s. OneTrust delayed the main content 292 ms less.