Didomi vs Usercentrics: cookie banner speed and features compared
On emulated mobile, Didomi and Usercentrics showed their banners in about the same time. The medians were 4.41 s for Didomi and 4.16 s for Usercentrics. Usercentrics delayed the main content 436 ms less. Both held trackers back in every check. Per vendor docs, only Didomi offers self-hosting. Per vendor docs, only Usercentrics offers a free tier.
Didomi Tested: Hosted
All Didomi results
Usercentrics Tested: Hosted
All Usercentrics results
Which is faster, Didomi or Usercentrics?
Shorter bars are better. The exception is tracker blocking, where the bar shows the share of checks passed.
| Question | Difference | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Banner appearsTime from navigation until the banner is visible on screen. Lower is better. | 4.41 s | 4.16 s | About the same. The gap is under 20%, within run-to-run noise. |
| Page slowed byExtra time before the main content paints (LCP), compared with the same page without a consent manager. | +1.28 s95% interval 1.26 s to 1.29 s | +844 ms95% interval 836 ms to 864 ms | Usercentrics delayed the main content 436 ms less. |
| Click responds inTime from pressing Accept until the screen updates. Under 200 ms feels instant. | 16 msOne visit measured | Under 16 msOne visit measured | About the same. They are less than 16 ms apart. |
| Blocks trackersChecks that no tracker runs, the page sets no cookie and no data leaves the page before the visitor chooses. | 4 of 4 checks passed | 4 of 4 checks passed | Both held trackers back in every check. |
| Adds to pageExtra data transferred during the first load, compared with the same page without a consent manager. | +253 KB95% interval: 253 KB | +164 KB95% interval: 164 KB | Usercentrics added 89 KB less to the first load. |
“About the same” means that the two results fall within each other’s spread. We measure both against the same page without a consent manager. We do not publish a direct head-to-head interval yet.
Page vitals and load times
Lab detail for engineers. All values are medians on the mobile profile. Both CMPs ran on Next.js 16.
| Metric | Didomi | Usercentrics |
|---|---|---|
| TTFB | No measurable delaypage 5 ms | No measurable delaypage 7 ms |
| FCP | No measurable delaypage 248 ms | No measurable delaypage 252 ms |
| LCP | +1.28 spage 4.72 s | +844 mspage 4.30 s |
| CLS | No measurable shiftpage 0.00 | No measurable shiftpage 0.00 |
| Metric | Didomi | Usercentrics |
|---|---|---|
| CMP script requested | ||
| CMP script loaded | ||
| Consent state known | ||
| Banner visible | 4.41 s | 4.16 s |
| Metric | Didomi | Usercentrics |
|---|---|---|
| Screen responds | 16 ms | Under 16 ms |
| Banner gone | ||
| Consent applied | ||
| Analytics active |
Which features differ between Didomi and Usercentrics?
Statuses come from each vendor’s documentation. Each status links to its source.
- Verified by test
- Per vendor docs
- Partial
- Not supported
- Unknown
| Feature | Didomi | Usercentrics |
|---|---|---|
| Only Didomi · 2 | ||
| Self-hostableDeveloper | Assets through your domain (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab) | Hosted backend (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab) |
| First-party SDKsFrameworks | React (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab) | Script tag only (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab) |
| Only Usercentrics · 1 | ||
| Free tierPricing | Contact sales (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab) | 1,000 sessions a month (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab) |
Same on both · 14
Should you choose Didomi or Usercentrics?
We built these lists from the measured and documented differences above. Neither list is a recommendation.
Choose Didomi if
- You want self-hosting
- You want a first-party SDK for React
Choose Usercentrics if
- You want a free tier
- Page load time matters to you: Usercentrics delayed the main content 436 ms less
- Page weight matters to you: Usercentrics added 89 KB less to the first load
What was tested?
- Deployment
- Both ran from their vendor-hosted services. Network distance to each vendor is part of the result.
Questions about Didomi and Usercentrics
Answers come from the benchmark run and from each vendor’s documentation.
Not in a way this run can separate. Their banner times were about the same. The gap is under 20%, within run-to-run noise. Usercentrics delayed the main content 436 ms less.
Both document it. Statuses come from vendor docs.
Both held trackers back in every check. Each check loads the page. Then it looks for trackers that ran, cookies that the page set or data that left the page before the visitor chose.
Other comparisons
c15tvs
Usercentricsc15t’s banner 3.92 s sooner · 1 standard differsc15tvs
Didomic15t’s banner 4.17 s sooner · 1 standard differsOneTrustvs
DidomiBanner times about the same · 1 framework SDK differsOneTrustvs
UsercentricsBanner times about the same · 2 features differc15tvs
OneTrustc15t’s banner 3.67 s sooner · 1 standard differs
c15tvs
CookieYesc15t’s banner 2.18 s sooner · 1 standard differs