Cookie Control vs OneTrust: cookie banner speed and features compared
On desktop, Cookie Control showed its banner sooner, in a median 385 ms against 629 ms for OneTrust. Neither added a measurable delay. Neither leaked a tracker in the checks that ran. We could not run 1 of 4 checks for Cookie Control. Per vendor docs, only Cookie Control offers a free tier. Per vendor docs, only OneTrust offers self-hosting.
Cookie Control Tested: v9, hosted
All Cookie Control results
OneTrust Tested: Hosted
All OneTrust results
Which is faster, Cookie Control or OneTrust?
Shorter bars are better. The exception is tracker blocking, where the bar shows the share of checks passed.
| Question | Difference | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Banner appearsTime from navigation until the banner is visible on screen. Lower is better. | 385 ms | 629 ms | Cookie Control’s banner appeared 245 ms sooner. |
| Page slowed byExtra time before the main content paints (LCP), compared with the same page without a consent manager. | No measurable delay95% interval −16 ms to 20 ms | No measurable delay95% interval −20 ms to 20 ms | Neither added a measurable delay. |
| Click responds inTime from pressing Accept until the screen updates. Under 200 ms feels instant. | 16 msOne visit measured | 24 msOne visit measured | About the same. They are less than 16 ms apart. |
| Blocks trackersChecks that no tracker runs, the page sets no cookie and no data leaves the page before the visitor chooses. | 3 of 4 checks passed1 could not be checked | 4 of 4 checks passed | Neither leaked a tracker in the checks that ran. We could not run 1 of 4 checks for Cookie Control. |
| Adds to pageExtra data transferred during the first load, compared with the same page without a consent manager. | +99 KB95% interval: 99 KB | +211 KB95% interval: 211 KB | Cookie Control added 113 KB less to the first load. |
“About the same” means that the two results fall within each other’s spread. We measure both against the same page without a consent manager. We do not publish a direct head-to-head interval yet.
Page vitals and load times
Lab detail for engineers. All values are medians on the desktop profile. Both CMPs ran on Next.js 16.
| Metric | Cookie Control | OneTrust |
|---|---|---|
| TTFB | No measurable delaypage 6 ms | No measurable delaypage 6 ms |
| FCP | No measurable delaypage 64 ms | No measurable delaypage 60 ms |
| LCP | No measurable delaypage 128 ms | No measurable delaypage 124 ms |
| CLS | No measurable shiftpage 0.00 | No measurable shiftpage 0.00 |
| Metric | Cookie Control | OneTrust |
|---|---|---|
| CMP script requested | ||
| CMP script loaded | ||
| Consent state known | ||
| Banner visible | 385 ms | 629 ms |
| Metric | Cookie Control | OneTrust |
|---|---|---|
| Screen responds | 16 ms | 24 ms |
| Banner gone | ||
| Consent applied | ||
| Analytics active |
Which features differ between Cookie Control and OneTrust?
Statuses come from each vendor’s documentation. Each status links to its source.
- Verified by test
- Per vendor docs
- Partial
- Not supported
- Unknown
| Feature | Cookie Control | OneTrust |
|---|---|---|
| Only Cookie Control · 1 | ||
| Free tierPricing | Community edition (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab) | Quote-based pricing (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab) |
| Only OneTrust · 1 | ||
| Self-hostableDeveloper | Hosted service (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab) | Script only; hosted backend (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab) |
| Not confirmed for one side · 1 | ||
| IAB GPPStandards | Unknown | Per vendor docs (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab) |
Same on both · 13
Should you choose Cookie Control or OneTrust?
We built these lists from the measured and documented differences above. Neither list is a recommendation.
Choose Cookie Control if
- You want a free tier
- A fast banner matters to you: Cookie Control’s banner appeared 245 ms sooner
- Page weight matters to you: Cookie Control added 113 KB less to the first load
Choose OneTrust if
- You want self-hosting
What was tested?
- Deployment
- Both ran from their vendor-hosted services. Network distance to each vendor is part of the result.
Questions about Cookie Control and OneTrust
Answers come from the benchmark run and from each vendor’s documentation.
On the desktop profile, Cookie Control’s banner appeared in a median 385 ms and OneTrust’s in 629 ms. Neither added a measurable delay.
Both document it. Statuses come from vendor docs.
Neither leaked a tracker in the checks that ran. We could not run 1 of 4 checks for Cookie Control. Each check loads the page. Then it looks for trackers that ran, cookies that the page set or data that left the page before the visitor chose.
Other comparisons
c15tvs
OneTrustc15t’s banner 603 ms sooner · 1 standard differs
c15tvs
Cookie Controlc15t’s banner 358 ms sooner · 1 standard differsOneTrustvs
DidomiDidomi’s banner 164 ms sooner · 1 framework SDK differs
CookieYesvsOneTrustCookieYes’ banner 242 ms sooner · 1 feature differs
OneTrustvs
UsercentricsBanner times about the same · 2 features differ
OsanovsOneTrustBanner times about the same · 3 features differ