Skip to main content

c15t vs Ketch: cookie banner speed and features compared

Results for

On desktop, c15t showed its banner sooner, in a median 60 ms against 1.68 s for Ketch. Ketch delayed the main content 16 ms less. Both held trackers back in every check. Per vendor docs, only c15t offers self-hosting. Per vendor docs, only Ketch offers a Google-certified CMP.

c15tinth

c15t Tested: 3.0.0-alpha.10
All c15t results

KetchKetch

Ketch Tested: Hosted
All Ketch results

Which is faster, c15t or Ketch?

Shorter bars are better. The exception is tracker blocking, where the bar shows the share of checks passed.

c15t and Ketch on the desktop profile, Next.js 16
Questionc15tKetchDifference
Banner appearsTime from navigation until the banner is visible on screen. Lower is better.
60 msFast
1.68 sSlow

c15t’s banner appeared 1.62 s sooner.

Page slowed byExtra time before the main content paints (LCP), compared with the same page without a consent manager.
+16 ms95% interval 8 ms to 40 msSmall
0 msSmall

Ketch delayed the main content 16 ms less.

Click responds inTime from pressing Accept until the screen updates. Under 200 ms feels instant.
16 msOne visit measuredFast
40 msOne visit measuredFast

c15t responded 24 ms sooner. Both are under 200 ms, which feels instant.

Blocks trackersChecks that no tracker runs, the page sets no cookie and no data leaves the page before the visitor chooses.
4 of 4 checks passedBlocked
4 of 4 checks passedBlocked

Both held trackers back in every check.

Adds to pageExtra data transferred during the first load, compared with the same page without a consent manager.
+112 KB95% interval: 112 KBModerate
+532 KBHeavy

c15t added 420 KB less to the first load.

“About the same” means that the two results fall within each other’s spread. We measure both against the same page without a consent manager. We do not publish a direct head-to-head interval yet.

Page vitals and load times

Lab detail for engineers. All values are medians on the desktop profile. Both CMPs ran on Next.js 16.

Page vitalsChange against the same page without a consent manager.
Metricc15tKetch
TTFB+17 mspage 22 ms0 mspage 5 ms
FCP+28 mspage 92 ms−4 mspage 60 ms
LCP+16 mspage 148 ms0 mspage 116 ms
CLSNo measurable shiftpage 0.00No measurable shiftpage 0.00
Load timesMilliseconds from navigation.
Metricc15tKetch
CMP script requested
CMP script loaded
Consent state known166 ms
Banner visible60 ms1.68 s
After AcceptMilliseconds from the click.
Metricc15tKetch
Screen responds16 ms40 ms
Banner gone
Consent applied
Analytics active

Which features differ between c15t and Ketch?

Statuses come from each vendor’s documentation. Each status links to its source.

  • Verified by test
  • Per vendor docs
  • Partial
  • Not supported
  • Unknown
Features that differ between c15t and Ketch, from vendor docs
Featurec15tKetch
Only c15t · 2
Self-hostableDeveloperPer vendor docs (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab)Hosted service (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab)
First-party SDKsFrameworksReact, Next.js, Vue, Nuxt, Svelte, SvelteKit, Astro, TanStack Start (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab)Script tag only (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab)
Only Ketch · 1
Google-certified CMPStandardsNot on Google’s list (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab)Per vendor docs (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab)
Same on both · 13
Features with the same status for c15t and Ketch
Featurec15tKetch
IAB TCFStandardsPer vendor docs (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab)TCF v2.2 (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab)
IAB GPPStandardsGPP 1.1 (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab)Per vendor docs (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab)
Google Consent Mode v2StandardsPer vendor docs (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab)Per vendor docs (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab)
Global Privacy ControlStandardsPer vendor docs (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab)Per vendor docs (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab)
Geo-targeted bannersCompliancePer vendor docs (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab)Per vendor docs (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab)
Script blockingCompliancePer vendor docs (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab)Tag orchestration (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab)
Consent recordsComplianceWith a backend (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab)Per vendor docs (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab)
Cookie scanningComplianceVia Inth Website Audit (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab)Per vendor docs (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab)
Open sourceDeveloperApache-2.0 (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab)SDKs and samples only (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab)
Headless UIDeveloperPer vendor docs (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab)Per vendor docs (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab)
TypeScript typesDeveloperPer vendor docs (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab)Per vendor docs (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab)
Free tierPricingOpen source; hosted free plan (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab)5,000 users (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab)
Script tagFrameworksPer vendor docs (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab)Per vendor docs (vendor documentation, opens in a new tab)

Should you choose c15t or Ketch?

We built these lists from the measured and documented differences above. Neither list is a recommendation.

Choose c15t if

  • You want self-hosting
  • You want a first-party SDK for React, Next.js, Vue, Nuxt, Svelte, SvelteKit, Astro and TanStack Start
  • A fast banner matters to you: c15t’s banner appeared 1.62 s sooner
  • Page weight matters to you: c15t added 420 KB less to the first load

Choose Ketch if

  • You need a Google-certified CMP
  • Page load time matters to you: Ketch delayed the main content 16 ms less

What was tested?

Deployment
Both ran as hosted services. c15t ran against the hosted inth backend, not a local mock. Ketch ran from its vendor-hosted service. Network distance to each vendor is part of the result.

How we test: methodology cookiebench-v3.2.4

Questions about c15t and Ketch

Answers come from the benchmark run and from each vendor’s documentation.

On the desktop profile, c15t’s banner appeared in a median 60 ms and Ketch’s in 1.68 s. Ketch delayed the main content 16 ms less.