--- title: "Enzuzo vs Usercentrics" canonical: "https://cookiebench.com/compare/enzuzo-vs-usercentrics" last-updated: "2026-10-12" --- # Enzuzo vs Usercentrics: cookie banner speed and features On desktop, Enzuzo showed its banner sooner, in a median 477 ms against 672 ms for Usercentrics. Enzuzo delayed the main content by 4 ms. Usercentrics added no measurable delay. Both held trackers back in every check. Their documented features are the same in this comparison. We measured both in the same run, in a Next.js app. We measured each against the same page without a consent manager. They also share Script tag, React, Nuxt, Astro, TanStack Start integrations. ## Which is faster on desktop? Desktop profile: 1365 × 768 · No CPU slowdown · 12.5 MB/s, no added latency. | Question | Enzuzo | Usercentrics | Difference | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | How fast does the banner appear? | 477 ms | 672 ms | Enzuzo’s banner appeared 195 ms sooner. | | Does it slow the page down? | +4 ms | No measurable change | Enzuzo delayed the main content by 4 ms. Usercentrics added no measurable delay. | | How fast does a click respond? | 24 ms | 16 ms | About the same. They are less than 16 ms apart. | | Does it block trackers until consent? | 4 of 4 checks passed | 4 of 4 checks passed | Both held trackers back in every check. | | How much does it add to the page? | +153 KB | +164 KB (95% interval: 164 KB) | About the same. The gap is under 20%, within run-to-run noise. | ## Which is faster on mobile? Mobile (emulated) profile: 390 × 844, DPR 3 · Mid-tier phone CPU (4× slowdown) · 200 KB/s, 150 ms latency. On emulated mobile, Enzuzo showed its banner sooner, in a median 2.75 s against 4.16 s for Usercentrics. Their delay to the main content was about the same. The gap is under 20%, within run-to-run noise. Both held trackers back in every check. Their documented features are the same in this comparison. | Question | Enzuzo | Usercentrics | Difference | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | How fast does the banner appear? | 2.75 s | 4.16 s | Enzuzo’s banner appeared 1.40 s sooner. | | Does it slow the page down? | +768 ms | +844 ms (95% interval 836 ms to 864 ms) | About the same. The gap is under 20%, within run-to-run noise. | | How fast does a click respond? | 56 ms | Not measured (The click worked, but the browser reported no timing for it. That is not zero, and not proof it took under 16 ms) | No comparison. Usercentrics has no result here, so we call neither one better. | | Does it block trackers until consent? | 4 of 4 checks passed | 4 of 4 checks passed | Both held trackers back in every check. | | How much does it add to the page? | +153 KB | +164 KB (95% interval: 164 KB) | About the same. The gap is under 20%, within run-to-run noise. | ## Which features differ? | Feature | Enzuzo | Usercentrics | | --- | --- | --- | | IAB TCF | Per vendor docs (Growth plan and up) | Per vendor docs (Pro plan and up) | | IAB GPP | Unknown | Per vendor docs (v3 script tag) | | Google Consent Mode v2 | Per vendor docs | Per vendor docs | | Google-certified CMP | Per vendor docs | Per vendor docs | | Global Privacy Control | Per vendor docs | Per vendor docs | | Geo-targeted banners | Per vendor docs (Growth plan and up) | Per vendor docs (Plus plan and up) | | Script blocking | Per vendor docs | Per vendor docs (Paid plans) | | Consent records | Per vendor docs | Per vendor docs (Kept 12 months) | | Cookie scanning | Per vendor docs | Per vendor docs | | Open source | Not supported (Hosted embed only) | Not supported (Commercial licence) | | Self-hostable | Not supported (Hosted embed only) | Not supported (Hosted backend) | | Headless UI | Per vendor docs (Enterprise plan) | Per vendor docs | | TypeScript types | Unknown | Per vendor docs | | Free tier | Per vendor docs (5,000 visitors a month) | Per vendor docs (1,000 sessions a month) | | Script tag | Per vendor docs | Per vendor docs | | React SDK | Not supported (Script tag only) | Not supported (Script tag only) | | Next.js SDK | Not supported (Script tag only) | Not supported (Script tag only) | | Vue SDK | Not supported (Script tag only) | Not supported (Script tag only) | | Nuxt SDK | Not supported (Script tag only) | Not supported (Script tag only) | | Svelte SDK | Not supported (Script tag only) | Not supported (Script tag only) | | SvelteKit SDK | Not supported (Script tag only) | Not supported (Script tag only) | | Astro SDK | Not supported (Script tag only) | Not supported (Script tag only) | | TanStack Start SDK | Not supported (Script tag only) | Not supported (Script tag only) | ## Which should you choose? ### Choose Enzuzo if - A fast banner matters to you: Enzuzo’s banner appeared 195 ms sooner ### Choose Usercentrics if - Page load time matters to you: Enzuzo delayed the main content by 4 ms. Usercentrics added no measurable delay ## Questions about this pair ### Is Usercentrics slower than Enzuzo? On the desktop profile, Enzuzo’s banner appeared in a median 477 ms and Usercentrics’ in 672 ms. Enzuzo delayed the main content by 4 ms. Usercentrics added no measurable delay. ### Do Enzuzo and Usercentrics both support IAB TCF? Both document it. Statuses come from vendor docs. ### Do Enzuzo and Usercentrics block trackers before consent? Both held trackers back in every check. Each check loads the page. Then it looks for trackers that ran, cookies that the page set or data that left the page before the visitor chose. ## Related comparisons - [c15t vs Usercentrics](https://cookiebench.com/compare/c15t-vs-usercentrics.md) - [c15t vs Enzuzo](https://cookiebench.com/compare/c15t-vs-enzuzo.md) - [OneTrust vs Usercentrics](https://cookiebench.com/compare/onetrust-vs-usercentrics.md) - [Didomi vs Usercentrics](https://cookiebench.com/compare/didomi-vs-usercentrics.md) - [c15t vs OneTrust](https://cookiebench.com/compare/c15t-vs-onetrust.md) - [c15t vs CookieYes](https://cookiebench.com/compare/c15t-vs-cookieyes.md) Run `matrix-2026-10-12`, published 2026-10-12. Methodology [cookiebench-v3.2.4](https://cookiebench.com/methodology). inth, the team behind c15t, maintains CookieBench. c15t is one of the consent managers we measure ([disclosure](https://cookiebench.com/methodology)). Feature support comes from vendor documentation unless a row says "Verified by test".