--- title: "Enzuzo vs CookieYes" canonical: "https://cookiebench.com/compare/enzuzo-vs-cookieyes" last-updated: "2026-10-12" --- # Enzuzo vs CookieYes: cookie banner speed and features On desktop, Enzuzo and CookieYes showed their banners in about the same time. The medians were 477 ms for Enzuzo and 387 ms for CookieYes. Enzuzo delayed the main content by 4 ms. CookieYes added no measurable delay. Neither leaked a tracker in the checks that ran. We could not run 1 of 4 checks for CookieYes. Their documented features are the same in this comparison. We measured both in the same run, in a Next.js app. We measured each against the same page without a consent manager. They also share Script tag, React, Nuxt, Astro, TanStack Start integrations. ## Which is faster on desktop? Desktop profile: 1365 × 768 · No CPU slowdown · 12.5 MB/s, no added latency. | Question | Enzuzo | CookieYes | Difference | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | How fast does the banner appear? | 477 ms | 387 ms | About the same. The gap is under 20%, within run-to-run noise. | | Does it slow the page down? | +4 ms | No measurable change | Enzuzo delayed the main content by 4 ms. CookieYes added no measurable delay. | | How fast does a click respond? | 24 ms | 16 ms | About the same. They are less than 16 ms apart. | | Does it block trackers until consent? | 4 of 4 checks passed | 3 of 4 checks passed. We could not check the other 1 | Neither leaked a tracker in the checks that ran. We could not run 1 of 4 checks for CookieYes. | | How much does it add to the page? | +153 KB | +31 KB (95% interval: 31 KB) | CookieYes added 122 KB less to the first load. | ## Which is faster on mobile? Mobile (emulated) profile: 390 × 844, DPR 3 · Mid-tier phone CPU (4× slowdown) · 200 KB/s, 150 ms latency. On emulated mobile, Enzuzo and CookieYes showed their banners in about the same time. The medians were 2.75 s for Enzuzo and 2.42 s for CookieYes. CookieYes delayed the main content 592 ms less. Neither leaked a tracker in the checks that ran. We could not run 1 of 4 checks for CookieYes. Their documented features are the same in this comparison. | Question | Enzuzo | CookieYes | Difference | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | How fast does the banner appear? | 2.75 s | 2.42 s | About the same. The gap is under 20%, within run-to-run noise. | | Does it slow the page down? | +768 ms | +176 ms (95% interval 148 ms to 212 ms) | CookieYes delayed the main content 592 ms less. | | How fast does a click respond? | 56 ms | 24 ms | CookieYes responded 32 ms sooner. Both are under 200 ms, which feels instant. | | Does it block trackers until consent? | 4 of 4 checks passed | 3 of 4 checks passed. We could not check the other 1 | Neither leaked a tracker in the checks that ran. We could not run 1 of 4 checks for CookieYes. | | How much does it add to the page? | +153 KB | +31 KB (95% interval: 31 KB) | CookieYes added 122 KB less to the first load. | ## Which features differ? | Feature | Enzuzo | CookieYes | | --- | --- | --- | | IAB TCF | Per vendor docs (Growth plan and up) | Per vendor docs (Pro and Ultimate plans) | | IAB GPP | Unknown | Unknown | | Google Consent Mode v2 | Per vendor docs | Per vendor docs | | Google-certified CMP | Per vendor docs | Per vendor docs | | Global Privacy Control | Per vendor docs | Per vendor docs (Pro and Ultimate plans) | | Geo-targeted banners | Per vendor docs (Growth plan and up) | Per vendor docs (Pro and Ultimate plans) | | Script blocking | Per vendor docs | Per vendor docs | | Consent records | Per vendor docs | Per vendor docs | | Cookie scanning | Per vendor docs | Per vendor docs | | Open source | Not supported (Hosted embed only) | Not supported (Proprietary) | | Self-hostable | Not supported (Hosted embed only) | Unknown | | Headless UI | Per vendor docs (Enterprise plan) | Unknown | | TypeScript types | Unknown | Unknown | | Free tier | Per vendor docs (5,000 visitors a month) | Per vendor docs (5,000 pageviews a month) | | Script tag | Per vendor docs | Per vendor docs | | React SDK | Not supported (Script tag only) | Not supported (Script tag only) | | Next.js SDK | Not supported (Script tag only) | Not supported (Script tag only) | | Vue SDK | Not supported (Script tag only) | Not supported (Script tag only) | | Nuxt SDK | Not supported (Script tag only) | Not supported (Script tag only) | | Svelte SDK | Not supported (Script tag only) | Not supported (Script tag only) | | SvelteKit SDK | Not supported (Script tag only) | Not supported (Script tag only) | | Astro SDK | Not supported (Script tag only) | Not supported (Script tag only) | | TanStack Start SDK | Not supported (Script tag only) | Not supported (Script tag only) | ## Which should you choose? ### Choose Enzuzo if - Nothing measured or documented here favours Enzuzo. Decide on price, support and the tools that you already use ### Choose CookieYes if - Page load time matters to you: Enzuzo delayed the main content by 4 ms. CookieYes added no measurable delay - Page weight matters to you: CookieYes added 122 KB less to the first load ## Questions about this pair ### Is Enzuzo faster than CookieYes? Not in a way this run can separate. Their banner times were about the same. The gap is under 20%, within run-to-run noise. Enzuzo delayed the main content by 4 ms. CookieYes added no measurable delay. ### Do Enzuzo and CookieYes both support IAB TCF? Both document it. Statuses come from vendor docs. ### Do Enzuzo and CookieYes block trackers before consent? Neither leaked a tracker in the checks that ran. We could not run 1 of 4 checks for CookieYes. Each check loads the page. Then it looks for trackers that ran, cookies that the page set or data that left the page before the visitor chose. ## Related comparisons - [c15t vs CookieYes](https://cookiebench.com/compare/c15t-vs-cookieyes.md) - [c15t vs Enzuzo](https://cookiebench.com/compare/c15t-vs-enzuzo.md) - [CookieYes vs OneTrust](https://cookiebench.com/compare/cookieyes-vs-onetrust.md) - [iubenda vs CookieYes](https://cookiebench.com/compare/iubenda-vs-cookieyes.md) - [Cookie Control vs CookieYes](https://cookiebench.com/compare/cookie-control-vs-cookieyes.md) - [c15t vs OneTrust](https://cookiebench.com/compare/c15t-vs-onetrust.md) Run `matrix-2026-10-12`, published 2026-10-12. Methodology [cookiebench-v3.2.4](https://cookiebench.com/methodology). inth, the team behind c15t, maintains CookieBench. c15t is one of the consent managers we measure ([disclosure](https://cookiebench.com/methodology)). Feature support comes from vendor documentation unless a row says "Verified by test".