# Enzuzo cookie banner: speed and features on Nuxt

Hosted privacy compliance suite with a cookie banner.

- Vendor: Enzuzo
- Website: https://www.enzuzo.com
- Version tested: Hosted
- Framework: Nuxt

We measured other CMPs on Next.js only, so on Nuxt this comparison uses Enzuzo’s other integrations. [Enzuzo on Next.js](https://cookiebench.com/benchmarks/enzuzo.md).

## Desktop

Desktop profile: 1365 × 768 · No CPU slowdown · 12.5 MB/s, no added latency.

In our tests with its Nuxt integration, Enzuzo showed its cookie banner in a median 480 ms on desktop. It delayed the main content by 4 ms. Accept responded in 16 ms and Reject in 16 ms. It held trackers back in all 4 consent checks.

On an emulated mid-tier phone, the banner took 2.49 s. Per vendor docs, Enzuzo supports IAB TCF, Google Consent Mode v2, Google CMP certification and Global Privacy Control. We could not confirm IAB GPP.

| Question | Answer | How it compares | Context |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| How fast does the banner appear? | 480 ms | 6th fastest of 6 Enzuzo integrations | Median of 15 visits. |
| Does it slow the page down? | +4 ms | Joint 3rd of 6 Enzuzo integrations, from least to most delay | Compared with the same page without a consent manager. There were too few paired visits to calculate an interval. |
| How fast does a click respond? | 16 ms | Joint fastest of 6 Enzuzo integrations | Reject responded in 16 ms. Under 200 ms feels instant. |
| Does it block trackers until consent? | 4 of 4 checks passed | All 6 Enzuzo integrations passed every check | No tracker ran and the page set no cookie before the visitor chose. |

### Known issues on desktop

- Its remote script or config changed during the run, so the run gives no confidence intervals for this cell. Differences are medians only.

## Mobile

Mobile (emulated) profile: 390 × 844, DPR 3 · Mid-tier phone CPU (4× slowdown) · 200 KB/s, 150 ms latency.

In our tests with its Nuxt integration, Enzuzo showed its cookie banner in a median 2.49 s on an emulated mid-tier phone. It delayed the main content by 772 ms. Accept responded in 56 ms and Reject in 56 ms. It held trackers back in all 4 consent checks.

On desktop, the banner took 480 ms. Per vendor docs, Enzuzo supports IAB TCF, Google Consent Mode v2, Google CMP certification and Global Privacy Control. We could not confirm IAB GPP.

| Question | Answer | How it compares | Context |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| How fast does the banner appear? | 2.49 s | 4th fastest of 6 Enzuzo integrations | Median of 15 visits. |
| Does it slow the page down? | +772 ms | Joint 4th of 6 Enzuzo integrations, from least to most delay | Compared with the same page without a consent manager. There were too few paired visits to calculate an interval. |
| How fast does a click respond? | 56 ms | Joint 3rd fastest of 6 Enzuzo integrations | Reject responded in 56 ms. Under 200 ms feels instant. |
| Does it block trackers until consent? | 4 of 4 checks passed | All 6 Enzuzo integrations passed every check | No tracker ran and the page set no cookie before the visitor chose. |

### Known issues on mobile

- Its remote script or config changed during the run, so the run gives no confidence intervals for this cell. Differences are medians only.

## Which standards and features does Enzuzo support?

### Standards

| Feature | Support | Source |
| --- | --- | --- |
| IAB TCF | Per vendor docs (Growth plan and up) | https://www.enzuzo.com/consent-management-software |
| IAB GPP | Unknown | – |
| Google Consent Mode v2 | Per vendor docs | https://www.enzuzo.com/consent-management-software |
| Google-certified CMP | Per vendor docs | https://support.google.com/adsense/answer/13554116 |
| Global Privacy Control | Per vendor docs | https://www.enzuzo.com/consent-management-software |

### Compliance

| Feature | Support | Source |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Geo-targeted banners | Per vendor docs (Growth plan and up) | https://www.enzuzo.com/pricing |
| Script blocking | Per vendor docs | https://help.enzuzo.com/en/articles/8594330-content-blocking |
| Consent records | Per vendor docs | https://www.enzuzo.com/consent-management-software |
| Cookie scanning | Per vendor docs | https://help.enzuzo.com/en/articles/7938847-cookie-manager-setup-guide |

### Developer

| Feature | Support | Source |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Open source | Not supported (Hosted embed only) | https://help.enzuzo.com/en/articles/7943294-installing-your-cookie-banner |
| Self-hostable | Not supported (Hosted embed only) | https://help.enzuzo.com/en/articles/7943294-installing-your-cookie-banner |
| Headless UI | Per vendor docs (Enterprise plan) | https://www.enzuzo.com/pricing |
| TypeScript types | Unknown | – |

### Pricing

| Feature | Support | Source |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Free tier | Per vendor docs (5,000 visitors a month) | https://www.enzuzo.com/pricing |

## Which frameworks does Enzuzo work with?

Enzuzo has no first-party framework SDKs. It installs through a script tag in each framework listed. This run measured 6 integrations, each against the same app without a consent manager. The results at the top start on Next.js, the framework that we tested every CMP on. The Framework menu switches them.

| Framework | Integration | Benchmarked |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Script tag | Script tag | [Yes](https://cookiebench.com/benchmarks/enzuzo/script-tag.md) |
| React | Script tag | [Yes](https://cookiebench.com/benchmarks/enzuzo/react.md) |
| Next.js | Script tag | [Yes](https://cookiebench.com/benchmarks/enzuzo.md) |
| Vue | Script tag | No |
| Nuxt | Script tag | Yes (this page) |
| Svelte | Script tag | No |
| SvelteKit | Script tag | No |
| Astro | Script tag | [Yes](https://cookiebench.com/benchmarks/enzuzo/astro.md) |
| TanStack Start | Script tag | [Yes](https://cookiebench.com/benchmarks/enzuzo/tanstack-start.md) |

## How does Enzuzo compare?

- [c15t vs Enzuzo](https://cookiebench.com/compare/c15t-vs-enzuzo.md): Side-by-side results from the same run.

## Questions about Enzuzo

### How fast is Enzuzo’s cookie banner?

On desktop, it appeared in a median 477 ms, against 471 ms for the median of the 10 CMPs measured. On an emulated mid-tier phone, it appeared in a median 2.75 s, against 2.71 s for the median of the 10 CMPs measured.

### Does Enzuzo slow down the page?

On desktop it delayed the main content by 4 ms. On an emulated mid-tier phone it delayed the main content by 768 ms. Delay is the extra time before the main content appears. We compare Largest Contentful Paint on the same page, with and without a consent manager.

### Does Enzuzo block trackers before consent?

It passed 4 of 4 checks on desktop and on an emulated mid-tier phone. A check fails if a tracker runs, the page sets a cookie or data leaves the page before the visitor chooses.

### Does Enzuzo support IAB TCF and IAB GPP?

Per vendor docs, Enzuzo supports IAB TCF, Google Consent Mode v2, Google CMP certification and Global Privacy Control. We could not confirm IAB GPP. Feature support comes from Enzuzo’s documentation. CookieBench did not test these features itself.

Spotted a mistake? [Report a correction](https://cookiebench.com/corrections.md) and we will re-check it.

Methodology [cookiebench-v3.2.4](https://cookiebench.com/methodology). inth, the team behind c15t, maintains CookieBench. c15t is one of the consent managers we measure ([disclosure](https://cookiebench.com/methodology)). Feature support comes from vendor documentation unless a row says "Verified by test".